ext_277841 ([identity profile] johncomic.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] johncomic 2011-08-11 04:47 pm (UTC)

Probably not ideal ones, but a quick browse around gives some idea of what I'm getting at:

http://www.pencilsandinks.com/art/pni5a1ed22303cc4f599.jpg (http://www.pencilsandinks.com/art/pni5a1ed22303cc4f599.jpg)

The linework is uniformly dense with no depth of field -- no differentiation of figures in front from figures behind, no foreground/background clarity, forms tend to mush into each other.

http://dialbforblog.com/archives/100/jrjr.jpg (http://dialbforblog.com/archives/100/jrjr.jpg)

Adding colour helps the forms to distinguish themselves a little, but there's still a sense of a uniform jumble, nothing to lead the eye through the picture.

http://cdn.comicartfans.com/Images/Category_4384/subcat_88270/26.jpg (http://cdn.comicartfans.com/Images/Category_4384/subcat_88270/26.jpg)

In panels 2 and 3 (if you don't count the figure on the right as a panel, it isn't clear if it's a panel and, if so, which panel it is) -- anyway, in those two on the left, the hatching in the background serves no purpose other than to make the background similar to the foreground in line density, and make those fields mush together visually.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting